![]() ![]() I propose here to look at the nature of this combination (more closely than I was able in an earlier essay (Robey, 1984)), to examine Eco’s work on the media in relation to his semiotic theory as a whole and the claims he makes for it, with a view to understanding better just how the theory affects the practice. ![]() ![]() This combination of theory and practice is clearly a major source of strength, but, to a pragmatic English-speaking public, it is also an obvious source of difficulty complex theoretical systems tend for us to be objects of suspicion in themselves, and still more when they are proposed as a guide to practical activity. At the same time, in his semiotic theory, he has developed an imposingly elaborate conceptual framework, within which the rest of his work is conducted. He has produced, both as a journalist and at a more specialist level, a constant flow of acute, forceful and usually entertaining articles and essays on specific topics in broadcasting, publishing, advertising and related aspects of modern mass culture. As a student and critic of the mass media, Umberto Eco displays a remarkable range and combination of qualities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |